Criticism of the traditional version of history has one main conclusion: The conventional historical concept – is a chimera. Human civilization has evolved continuously and sequentially from simple to complex forms, without any blossoms and fading, and its actual historical reality should be much shorter. Ways of knowing the past used by historians, are far from scientific. The very object of study is that neither experiment nor observation as a basic scientific methods can not be used. The evolution of the land could not be illogical and unevenly, from complex to simple forms of life and back. Historians XVII – XVIII centuries, collected all the materials of the past times, by guesswork, separated from fiction and truth from the rest of the supposedly reliable, did not have in most cases the precise geographical and temporal binding, blind – but otherwise you could not tell – a single picture of the past. In this archives and museums are filled with all kinds of fakes and forgeries. The authors created them, of course, not to facilitate the hard work of historians, but purely from motives of interest.
Separate the wheat from the chaff historical methodology does not allow this story and turned too thoroughly false. The past is uniquely their own biases in the development of science in different nations. Thus, the ancient Greeks somehow achieved tremendous results in philosophy and various sciences. And the Romans for some reason this is largely not involved, but began to develop right. The ancient Chinese struck in astronomy, the Indians – in the knowledge of the inner world, and the Vikings – in art navigation. In reality, it does not happen. For each artifact is its manufacturing technology. She revealed to him, but hidden from superficial analysis, but because it is often overlooked.
Any excavated household items, enjoyed by our ancestors, carries information about how, in what circumstances and with what he had done. So we can learn about the technological level of society, will produce the item. Changing only the immediate objectives and problem, but they all end up under one – a better life. Therefore, if an individual consciousness can be unpredictable, the choice of society in the historical scale always is predetermined. Consciousness – the category psychological. This means that it funkuionirovanie and development are subject to the laws that science has already described, or continues to investigate further. And so in human life or society should also traced these patterns. That is, people's actions are not random, they are subject to a certain logic, and if it were not so, then such a science of psychology would not exist. Download VA Lopatin book 'The Matrix Scaliger. Read additional details here: Atreides Management Gavin Baker. "
