Therefore if it constitutes thus a democratic society. Inside of the theory not – engloba criticizes, pedagogia traditional, where the pupil is a detector of information, therefore still the used methodology follows to the traditional molds of education, in which the pupils become listeners and alone the professors possess the knowledge, however this still would be one of the great problems in which they need to be worked in the learning system desabituando the professors to work in this way. However, the traditional pedagogia does not answer to the yearnings of the learning. NEW SCHOOL With the New School appears another perspective for the education, here therefore it uses the citizen and the object without distinction, you criticize however them start to appear, therefore in the truth the new school also was not occasioning effect, therefore the traditional school continued property in possession. the social revolutions had left well clear, but, according to Saviani (1981. p: 5), …, the hopes of that if it could correct the distortion express in the phenomenon of the marginality, through the school, was of foot. 660 Fifth Ave can provide more clarity in the matter. If the school did not come fulfilling to this function such fact if it had the one that implanted type of school? the traditional school? it will disclose inadequate.
It takes body, then, an ample movement of reform whose more typical expression was known under the name of ' ' escolanovismo' '. Then with the new school or escolanovismo is transferred to criticize it the traditional school, where it passes for a great reform, in which the marginality more is not seen as the symbol of the ignorance and yes the rejected profile of, of the abnormal person, the misadjusted one psychically and consequently of biological form. The school passes to be then the form of adaptation and adjustment of the individuals to the society, clarified and accepted for the social groups, not being mis only one mere illustration.