The emotions associates to the condition of life of the citizen if integrate in its production of sentido’ ‘. In one of its exits secretely of the institute, Mirco decides to take the friends to the cinema. The children make quotas and invent an excuse to attend the cinema without the presence of the parents. There we find one of the most beautiful scenes of the film. The sensation lived for the children who could be in the cinema and hear its sounds, exactly without being able to enxergar the scenes, fact this motivated by the fantastic experiences that Mirco already had had going to the cinema with its father.
Making this they breached with the institucional norms to live a concrete sensation, realimentando the lost dreams of these children. Bringing the recognition of these children while protagonists of its histories of life: ‘ ‘ we can say that he has a citizen when has direction production, when has differentiation and singularity. Without this, the citizen is annulled for objective determination externas’ ‘. (GONZLEZ-REY, 2004, P. 138) In the outcome of the film, we will see that the experience of the boys is discovered by the director who, as punishment, it decides to banish the Mirco. However it has the appeal of Professor Don Giulio so that the boy is not banishes, since he recognizes the production of the child as an expression form and questions front to the Director, the values of the institution. On the other hand, Frenchman, the girl friend of Mirco, looks Ettore, militant politician who mobilizes all the city and threat to stop the steel mill if the Mirco was not readmitted. Finally, Mirco is readmitted and authorized to present its history in the spectacle of end of year of the institution, for the parents, sharing it with the friends.